When the superintendent responded, it was easier - and clearer - to include my reply within the body of his email. My responses to him are in red, below. The science supervisor, world languages supervisor, principal, and entire Board of Education were copied. This school year, two members of the Board of Education - out of 10 - have responded to my inquiry.
Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Subject: Re: Inquiry regarding science lab at Community Park: why has it not yet begun? To: Steve Cochrane Dear Jen, Jennifer. Thank you for reaching out with this question. I know it comes from a passionate concern about equity for our students, particularly those who may be from demographic groups that are traditionally underrepresented in the field of science. PPS has an established aversion to facts — this is why I emailed. If I had contacted the BoE sooner, perhaps this wouldn’t have been allowed to happen: DLI renewal presentation, 11/15/2016 BoE meeting. Dineen was asked if she’d encountered any problems with the program, to which she responded (52:56 mark) “I haven’t discovered any huge problems or even small problems…” Steve, it is well-documented that you, Priscilla, and Betsy knew that science lab had been taken away from DLI children without informing parents, and that it was a big issue that was still ongoing, but nobody corrected Dineen. The program was renewed — inequity continued for another year. I want to begin my response by once again inviting you to sit down with me and Dr. Cohen to talk about Science Lab at CP. Dr. Cohen extended that invitation on behalf of both us in his email of June 15. We’ve met twice: 1.) 10/27/15 DLI parents meeting at CP. You said you knew nothing about science lab being taken away from DLI students until Betsy invited you to address the issue. Your statement was disputed by Priscilla and Dineen. - When did you really find out about the situation? Did you make the call to take science lab away from DLI kids without telling families? 2.) 2/11/16 Your office, smaller group of parents. You backed Eddie’s suggestion of piloting Engineering is Elementary (EIE) for all kids in K-2. By fall of 2016, both EIE and the tenured science teacher disappeared. I have also (unsuccessfully) met twice with Eddie. Since we didn’t hear back from you, I wanted to offer again. Parent meetings have been used as damage control to keep facts from getting out to other parents — and the Board of Education. I didn’t respond; instead, I focused on a FOIA to see how much money you spent on sending the district law firm after me. A face-to-face conversation might allow for a more nuanced and solution-based exchange of ideas not only about science lab but about the many aspects of achieving equity in the Princeton Public Schools. “Nuance” — are you suggesting there is nuance to be found in girls, children of color, and economically disadvantaged children experiencing a widened STEM opportunity gap for two years? As for Science Lab at CP, it will start today, Monday, September 18. My children (DLI 2nd grade, 5th grade) finally began science lab on Friday, the 22nd. Science Lab, as you know, is a one-time-a-week, 50–60 minute addition to the required science instruction students receive from their classroom teachers. We did delay the start of Science Lab one week at CP, which means students missed 50–60 minutes of additional science. The question is, Why did we delay the start? The question is, why do you find it acceptable to respond to inequity with more inequity? Equity is not just about the time devoted to instruction; it is also about the content and quality of that instruction. Are you really explaining the concept of equity to a woman whose daughter has not had equitable science lab instruction for two years? This is sexist and condescending. If we give all students the same time but there is a variance in the quality or content, we are not achieving equity. This somewhat defines what you, Eddie, Priscilla, and Dineen have been doing for two years: a bilingual classroom aide pressed into service and rebranded as a “science teacher” or supplanting science lab with EIE for a few months, only to see it disappear. The science specialist at CP is new to our district. Yes, 2017 graduate with a BA in education. According to these Board docs, she has been with PPS since July. If she has been with PPS since then, why did Eddie not prep her in time the start of school? She spent the past week visiting the science specialists at the other elementary schools to observe their lessons, discuss the content of their units for the year, and explore the materials and strategies they use in their classrooms. As far as visiting all of the specialists the first week of school, do you stand by this statement? She also spent time connecting with the classroom teachers at CP to review their year-long plans for science instruction so that her Science Lab lessons could logically extend the learning of our students. If our equity goal is high quality instruction that is consistent across schools, then that one week of preparation and collaboration for a new teacher was appropriate. 1.) According to Brenda Sewell, “Ms. Mulrooney will be approved retroactively at the Board meeting on Tuesday. Her official start date was the start of the school year.” Yet the BoE already approved her as receiving compensation in July — has she been working with PPS since July, yes or no? This matters because you are using her newness as another excuse for further inequity. 2.) PPS has been advertising for a replacement science teacher for CP for almost two years. Why is CP, which has a higher concentration of families of color and economically disadvantaged children than other PPS schools, such a low priority for you? And because I know you have raised questions in the past about the certifications of those teaching Science Lab at CP, I want to share with you that our new Science Specialist at CP has an elementary certification, a special education certification, and a bilingual/bicultural certification. Actually, I stated a fact: the DLI teachers were not certified to be bilingual teachers prior to the launch of the DLI program. She is also halfway through the coursework required to receive her middle school science certification, as there is no elementary science certification. Only one of the other three science specialists in our district has that science certification. Good for her, she is a brand new teacher with a BA, not a BS like the other science teachers, who have years more experience and connections. I believe we are well-positioned to provide high quality Science Lab experiences for all of the students at CP this year and in the years ahead. It is your good fortune as a white man to be able to look ahead beyond this example of institutional racism and sexism in Princeton Public Schools — seemingly without consequences. What of the children at CP who have gone two years without equitable STEM education? The children who can’t look ahead because they are even more behind? Latinx native Spanish speakers — valuable for their language but not valuable enough to receive equitable education; girls already receiving less-than, starting in kindergarten; the low income kids whose parents can’t supplement their STEM ed? What plan for reparations do you have for these affected children, for all of CP? I would welcome the opportunity to talk to you more about those experiences as well as the other steps we are taking throughout the district to support and inspire students from groups that have not always been proportionately represented in our higher level science courses. I would entertain this if members of the PPS BoE, NJDOE, Mercer County Superintendent’s office, STEM advocates and a civil rights group were present. For example, this summer we offered a two-week Science Enrichment Camp for 18 middle school students who were Black, Hispanic, or economically disadvantaged. The goal was to turn them on to the wonders of science and to have them see themselves as real scientists. They engaged in numerous activities, including designing experiments for — and launching — an underwater drone from a Coast Guard cutter! A program for middle school students cited in response to an issue regarding elementary school students? This is really reaching, it’s transparent redirection, and use of people of color as window dressing — the equivalent of “but I have a Black friend.” Jen, Jennifer. I am sure you have many ideas for what the Princeton Public Schools can do to enhance educational equity for our students. I applied for your community engagement councils several years ago, and I wasn’t selected. Nobody who openly supported teachers during their contract negotiations was selected. I would like to hear those ideas and to work cooperatively with you to make changes. I have decried this inequity to you for two years, and I already work, volunteer, and parent. In your position of overseeing a wealthy, boutique school district — bolstered by two Ivy League degrees and access to countless resources — the onus is on you for equitable ideas and solutions. Please let me know if you would like to meet. Wrangle schedules for the PPS BoE, NJDOE, Mercer County Superintendent’s office, STEM advocates, and a civil rights group, and perhaps this can happen. Sincerely, Steve
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Wife, parent, activist, white person with a conscience doing their part to dismantle white supremacy. ArchivesCategories |